Archive for the ‘Sky and Clouds’ Category
Photograph #58 Moonlight Feels Right
Tuesday, July 27th, 2010Photograph #57 Touched By the Sun
Monday, July 26th, 2010Some people won’t believe the color here
And I wouldn’t either, if I hadn’t been there, myself. This lasted long enough for me to see, swivel the camera, set the exposure and make one click. Maybe 15 seconds in all. The sky above the clouds was dusk gray, very little blue, and I am thankful I did not over-expose it too much.
Photograph #56 Almost Full
Sunday, July 25th, 2010Photograph #55 The Sky’s the Thing
Saturday, July 24th, 2010Partial color images are not usually my thing
I think they are too often gimmicky, but. Here, I wanted to diminish the foreground, which was full of deep greens and golds, and yet keep the framing. I desaturated, never finding the sweet spot until the foreground was all the way to black & white.
This is one of those effects that can be done with film but seldom is because it’s not easy. Digital development makes it almost too simple.
Photograph #53 Pure Prairie Sky
Thursday, July 22nd, 2010Here’s why the exposure details are worthless
To any other photographer but the one making the exposure. The ‘exposure value’ of the clouds here is ’16′. I’m shooting an nominal ISO of 100, focused at infinity. I could be shooting at f11, f16, or f22 with my 50mm lens, depending on the shutter speed.
Which was it? Can you tell?
The most important thing a photographer can learn is the proper level of exposure. This is given by the ‘exposure value’ or absolute level of light reflected from the brightest object in the frame, exclusive of specular highlights, as from waves or chrome. This value, in conjunction with the ISO of the medium, then determines the range of shutter speed/aperture settings that will expose the medium properly.
A light meter, whether internal to the camera or hand-held, reads the EV and does the math for you. The photographer then makes subjective judgments about depth of field or the degree of motion smear, or the higher or lower tonal values desired.
The actual lens/shutter settings will therefore vary from one person to another, from one situation to another, and will be specific to the moment and situation. There are times the photographer ignores the ‘right’ EV and exposes higher or lower in order to make a good photograph. In this particular case, I followed my light meter.
Photograph #044 Earth and Sky
Tuesday, July 13th, 2010Photograph #040 After the Storm
Friday, July 9th, 2010Photographing Rainbows for Fun
I expect most everybody who has tried to photograph a rainbow with an ordinary camera has come away a bit disappointed. Here’s why:
Ordinary digital cameras are designed to take the light in front of it and ‘optimize’ it to fit a pre-conceived scheme. This works about 70% of the time. At other times, the picture turns flat and dull. Sunset is one of those times. Notice the over-all golden tone in this photograph. The ordinary camera will shift that toward the blue-green (the complement or ‘opposite’ color to yellow-red) to compensate for what the little computer chip inside has been told is ‘bad light.’
And, often the ordinary camera will read the light from the rainbow as brighter in comparison to the rest of the scene. The result is an underexposed frame, again removing much interest. Other times, the camera might meter the overall frame but ignore the rainbow, leaving it overexposed.
Sometimes you can fix the photograph with the editing program that comes with the camera. Photoshop Elements is especially good for this. But, you will never get good results of a sunset or a rainbow using the ‘autofix’ function. You gotta do it by hand.








